Saturday, July 14, 2012
Sunday, March 11, 2012
What India Can Learn From China's Health System?
Bangalore: China is experiencing a gigantic disease burden transition, with an extraordinary social and environmental change, reported the medical journal Lancet. The transition will not only affect the country's future but also shape the pattern of global health. Lancet wishes to act as a bridge in order to have a scientific exchange between the rapidly expanding arena of medical science in China and the rest of the world.
As a nation whose culture and society have long been formed by its farming traditions, China has just passed a landmark, with its urban population of more than 680 million people outnumbering its rural residents for the first time in January, 2012. This serves as a double-edged sword for public health in China as it not only offers great opportunities in the improvements of health-care access and basic health infrastructure, but also poses substantial risks, including changing diets and lifestyle, air and water pollution, and occupational and traffic hazards.
Friday, September 23, 2011
Wednesday, August 17, 2011
Saturday, August 13, 2011
Thursday, July 14, 2011
Full text of Anna Hazare's letter to the PM !
Veteran social activist and Gandhian Anna Hazare has written an open letter to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh. In the letter dated April 6, 2011, Hazare has raised many questions and sought the Prime Minister's reply.
The 72-year-old social activist, supported by eminent persons including Kiran Bedi and Arvind Kejriwal, has been demanding that the drafting committee for the Lokpal Bill to tackle corruption should include members of civil society.
He started his fast-unto-death at New Delhi's Jantar Mantar on Tuesday to demand a stricter anti-corruption law that that is being proposed by the Government.

Below is the full text of Hazare's letter to the Prime Minister:
India Against Corruption
A-119, Kaushambi, Ghaziabad . 201010. UP Ph: 09868069953
www.indiaagainstcorruption.org
Date: April 6, 2011
To,
Dr. Manmohan Singh,
Hon'ble Prime Minister of India
New Delhi Dear
Dr. Singh,
I have started my indefinite fast at Jantar mantar. I had invited you also to fast and pray for a corruption free India on 5th April. Though I did not receive any reply from you, I am hopeful that you must have done that.
I am pained to read and hear about government's reaction to my fast. I consider it my duty to clarify the points raised on behalf of Congress party and the government by their spokespersons, as they appear in media:
1. It is being alleged that I am being instigated by some people to sit on this fast. Dear Manmohan Singh ji, this is an insult to my sense of wisdom and intelligence. I am not a kid that I could be "instigated" into going on an indefinite fast. I am a fiercely independent person. I take advice from many friends and critics, but do what my conscience directs me to do. It is my experience that when cornered, governments resort to such malicious slandering. I am pained that the government, rather than addressing the issue of corruption, is trying to allege conspiracies, when there are none.
2. It is being said that I have shown impatience. Dear Prime Minister, so far, every government has shown complete insensitivity and lack of political commitment to tackling corruption. 62 years after independence, we still do not have independent and effective anti-corruption systems. Very weak versions of Lokpal Bill were presented in Parliament eight times in last 42 years. Even these weak versions were not passed by Parliament. This means, left to themselves, the politicians and bureaucrats will never pass any law which subjects them to any kind of objective scrutiny. At a time, when the country has witnessed scams of unprecedented scale, the impatience of the entire country is justified. And we call upon you, not to look for precedents, but show courage to take unprecedented steps.
3. It is being said that I have shown impatience when the government has "initiated" the process. I would urge you to tell me - exactly what processes are underway?
a. You say that your Group of Ministers are drafting the anti-corruption law. Many of the members of this Group of Ministers have such a shady past that if effective anticorruption systems had been in place, some of them would have been behind bars. Do you want us to have faith in a process in which some of the most corrupt people of this country should draft the anti-corruption law?
b. NAC sub-committee has discussed Jan Lokpal Bill. But what does that actually mean? Will the government accept the recommendations of NAC sub-committee? So far, UPA II has shown complete contempt for even the most innocuous issues raised by NAC.
c. I and many other friends from India Against Corruption movement wrote several letters to you after 1st December. I also sent you a copy of Jan Lokpal Bill on 1st December. We did not get any response. It is only when I wrote to you that I will sit on an indefinite fast, we were promptly invited for discussions on 7th March. I wonder whether the government responds only to threats of indefinite fast. Before that, representatives of India Against Corruption had been meeting various Ministers seeking their support for the Jan Lokpal Bill. They met Mr Moily also and personally handed over copy of Jan Lokpal to him. A few hours before our meeting with you, we received a phone call from Mr Moily's office that the copy of Jan Lokpal Bill had been misplaced by his office and they wanted another copy. This is the seriousness with which the government has dealt with Jan Lokpal Bill.
d. Dear Dr Manmohan Singh ji, if you were in my place, would you have any faith in the aforesaid processes? Kindly let me know if there are any other processes underway. If you still feel that I am impatient, I am happy that I am because the whole nation is feeling impatient at the lack of credible efforts from your government against corruption.
4. What are we asking for? We are not saying that you should accept the Bill drafted by us. But kindly create a credible platform for discussions . a joint committee with at least half members from civil society suggested by us. Your spokespersons are misleading the nation when they say that there is no precedent for setting up a joint committee. At least seven laws in Maharashtra were drafted by similar joint committees and presented in Maharashtra Assembly. Maharashtra RTI Act, one of the best laws of those times, was drafted by a joint committee. Even at the centre, when 25,000 tribals came to Delhi two years ago, your government set up a joint committee on land issues within 48 hours. You yourself are the Chairperson of that committee. This means that the government is willing to set up joint committees on all other issues, but not on corruption. Why?
5. It is being said that the government wants to talk to us and we are not talking to them. This is utterly false. Tell me a single meeting when you called us and we did not come. We strongly believe in dialogue and engagement. Kindly do not mislead the country by saying that we are shunning dialogue. We request you to take some credible steps at stemming corruption. Kindly stop finding faults and suspecting conspiracies in our movement. There are none. Even if there were, it does not absolve you of your responsibilities to stop corruption.
With warm regards,
(K B Hazare)
Courtesy :
http://ibnlive.in.com/news/full-text-of-anna-hazares-letter-to-the-pm/148435-3.html
Wednesday, July 13, 2011
5 Must Read Business Books of the year 2011





Friday, July 8, 2011
Tuesday, June 28, 2011
Permanent House for USD $300 = Rs.15,000 (INR)


Vijay Govindarajan
Vijay Govindarajan is the Earl C. Daum 1924 Professor of International Business at the Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth. His most recent book is The Other Side of Innovation.
Vijay GovindarajanThe $300 House: A Hands-On Lab for Reverse Innovation?
12:07 PM Thursday August 26, 2010 | Comments ( 159)

The $300 House:
Editor's note: This post was written with Christian Sarkar, a marketing consultant who also works on environmental issues.
David A. Smith, the founder of the Affordable Housing Institute (AHI) tells us that "markets alone will never satisfactorily house a nation's poorest citizens...whether people buy or rent, housing is typically affordable to only half of the population."
The result? Smith points to a "spontaneous community of self-built or informally built homes — the shanty towns, settlements, and ever-expanding slums that sprout like mushrooms on the outskirts of cities in the developing world."
We started discussing the issue, examining the subject through the lens of reverse innovation.
Here are five questions Christian and I asked ourselves:
- How can organic, self-built slums be turned into livable housing?
- What might a house-for-the-poor look like?
- How can world-class engineering and design capabilities be utilized to solve the problem?
- What reverse-innovation lessons might be learned by the participants in such a project?
- How could the poor afford to buy this house?
Livable Housing. Our first thought was that self-built houses are usually built from materials that are available — cardboard, plastic, mud or clay, metal scraps and whatever else is nearby. Built on dirt floors, these structures are prone to collapse and catching fire. Solution: replace these unsafe structures with a mass-produced, standard, affordable, and sustainable solution. We want to create the $300-House-for-the-Poor.
Look and Feel. To designers, our sketch of this house might be a bit of a joke, but it's useful nonetheless to illustrate the concept, to get started. We wanted the house to be an ecosystem of products and solutions designed around the real needs of the inhabitants. Of course it would have to be made out of sustainable, green materials, but more crucially, it would have to be durable enough to withstand torrential rains, earthquakes, and the stress of children playing. The house might be a single room structure with drop-down partitions for privacy. Furniture — sleeping hammocks and fold-down chairs would be built in. The roof would boast an inexpensive solar panel and battery to light the house and charge the mobile phone and tablet computer. An inexpensive water filter would be built in as well.

In effect, the house is really a one-room shed designed around the family ecosystem, a lego-like aggregation of useful products that "bring good things to life" for the poor.
World-Class Design. Our next question was: "Who will do this?" We decided that it would be have to be a collaboration between global design and engineering companies and non-profits with experience solving problems for the poor. The usual suspects ran through our minds — IDEO, GE, TATA, Siemens, Habitat-for-Humanity, Partners In Health, the Solar Electric Light Fund, the Clinton Global Initiative, the Gates Foundation, Grameen. Governments may play an important part is setting the stage for these types of cross-country innovation projects.
The Reverse Innovation Payoff. Participating companies will reap two rewards. First, they will be able to serve the unserved, the 2.5 billion who make up the bottom of the pyramid. Second, they create new competencies which can help transform lives in rich countries by creating breakthrough innovations to solve several problems (scaled housing for hurricane victims, refugees, and even the armed forces).
A House of One's Own: Affordability. To move beyond charity, the poor must become owners of their homes, responsible for their care and upkeep. The model of social business introduced by Muhammad Yunus resonates strongly with us. Micro-finance must surely play a role in making the $300 House-for-the-Poor a viable and self-sustaining solution.
Of course, the idea we present here is an experiment. Nevertheless, we feel it deserves to be explored. From the one-room shacks in Haiti's Central Plateau to the jhuggi clusters in and around Delhi, to the favelas in São Paulo, the problem of housing-for-the-poor is truly global.
We ask CEOs, Governments, NGOs, Foundations: Are there any takers?
Courtesy :http://blogs.hbr.org/govindarajan/2010/08/the-300-house-a-hands-on-lab-f.html
Monday, June 27, 2011
CREATING AWARENESS ON LOKPALL BILL !
Government of India has put a condition that 25 CRORES of people support is needed to implement 'LOKPAL-BILL'. For this we just have to GIVE A call (free) to the number - +91 22 61550789 from your mobile. The call gets cut automatically after 1 ring. After giving a call to this number you will receive a thanks message. Please forward this to as many to make India corruption free. Please do it once, call the number...no charges.. do it for your country. In case you do not already know this ---- See how Lokpal Bill can curb the politicians , Circulate it to create awareness
Differences between Existing System and System Proposed by civil society
Without Lokpal : No politician or senior officer ever goes to jail despite huge evidence because Anti Corruption Branch (ACB) and CBI directly come under the government. Before starting investigation or initiating prosecution in any case, they have to take permission from the same bosses, against whom the case has to be investigated.
With Lokpal : Lokpal at centre and Lokayukta at state level will be independent bodies. ACB and CBI will be merged into these bodies. They will have power to initiate investigations and prosecution against any officer or politician without needing anyone’s permission. Investigation should be completed within 1 year and trial to get over in next 1 year. Within two years, the corrupt should go to jail.
Without Lokpal : No corrupt officer is dismissed from the job because Central Vigilance Commission, which is supposed to dismiss corrupt officers, is only an advisory body. Whenever it advises government to dismiss any senior corrupt officer, its advice is never implemented.
With Lokpal : Lokpal and Lokayukta will have complete powers to order dismissal of a corrupt officer. CVC and all departmental vigilance will be merged into Lokpal and state vigilance will be merged into Lokayukta.
Without Lokpal : No action is taken against corrupt judges because permission is required from the Chief Justice of India to even register an FIR against corrupt judges.
With Lokpal : Lokpal & Lokayukta shall have powers to investigate and prosecute any judge without needing anyone’s permission.
Without Lokpal : Nowhere to go - People expose corruption but no action is taken on their complaints.
With Lokpal : Lokpal & Lokayukta will have to enquire into and hear every complaint.
Without Lokpal : There is so much corruption within CBI and vigilance departments. Their functioning is so secret that it encourages corruption within these agencies.
With Lokpal : All investigations in Lokpal & Lokayukta shall be transparent. After completion of investigation, all case records shall be open to public. Complaint against any staff of Lokpal & Lokayukta shall be enquired and punishment announced within two months.
Without Lokpal : Weak and corrupt people are appointed as heads of anti-corruption agencies.
With Lokpal : Politicians will have absolutely no say in selections of Chairperson and members of Lokpal & Lokayukta. Selections will take place through a transparent and public participatory process.
Without Lokpal : Citizens face harassment in government offices. Sometimes they are forced to pay bribes. One can only complaint to senior officers. No action is taken on complaints because senior officers also get their cut.
With Lokpal : Lokpal & Lokayukta will get public grievances resolved in time bound manner, impose a penalty of Rs 250 per day of delay to be deducted from the salary of guilty officer and award that amount as compensation to the aggrieved citizen.
Without Lokpal : Nothing in law to recover ill gotten wealth. A corrupt person can come out of jail and enjoy that money.
With Lokpal : Loss caused to the government due to corruption will be recovered from all accused.
Without Lokpal : Small punishment for corruption- Punishment for corruption is minimum 6 months and maximum 7 years.
With Lokpal : Enhanced punishment - The punishment would be minimum 5 years and maximum of life imprisonment.
Wednesday, June 8, 2011
India's second freedom struggle !

Wednesday, May 18, 2011
Narayana Murthy's journey in his own words !
Narayana Murthy's journey in his own words

The inauguration of the first education center in Mysore by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and second one by Mrs. Sonia Gandhi, the President of Indian National Congress, were both reaffirmations of our long held belief in the importance of education and research......

There have been some moments of great dilemmas and sadness too. Biding goodbye to perhaps the brightest co-founder colleagues in early in the journey was disheartening. Refusing to accept unreasonab
Saturday, April 30, 2011
Wednesday, April 13, 2011
HIRING IN NON IT SECTORS SURGES !
Hiring in non-IT sectors surges
Thursday, 14 April 2011, 07:13 IST |
Saturday, April 9, 2011
Friday, April 8, 2011
Let us support - Shri Anna Hazare's Fight Against Corruption !
Thursday, March 31, 2011
Monday, March 28, 2011
Indian sarpanch dazzles at UN meet !
Indian sarpanch dazzles at UN meet
United Nations: There was a sense of disbelief among ministers and ambassadors from diverse nations when the chairperson of the 11th Info-Poverty World Conference held at the United Nations introduced the jeans-clad Chhavi Rajawat as head of a village in India.
For, from a distance one could easily mistake Rajawat, an articulate, computer-savvy woman, for a frontline model or at least a Bollywood actress. But she is sarpanch of Soda village, 60km from Jaipur, in backward Rajasthan and the changing face of growing dynamic rural India.
The 30-year-old Rajawat, India's youngest and the only MBA to become a village head - the position mostly occupied by elders, quit her senior management position with Bharti-Tele Ventures of Airtel Group to serve her beloved villagers as sarpanch.
Rajawat participated in a panel discussion at the two-day meet at the UN on March 24 and 25 on how civil society can implement its actions and spoke on the role of civil society in fighting poverty and promoting development.
It is necessary to re-think through various strategies of action that includes new technologies like e-services in achieving the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) in an era where resources have become limited, she told the delegates of the international conference.
"If India continues to make progress at the same pace as it has for the past 65 years since independence, it just won't be good enough. We'll be failing people who dream about having water, electricity, toilets, schools and jobs. I am convinced we can do it differently and do it faster.
"In the past year alone, I and the villagers in Soda have brought about a radical change in the village purely through our own efforts. We have had no outside support - no NGO help, no public, nor private sector help," she said . Please Read More
Poverty - India's 30 year report Card !
It takes just common sense to see why some people remain poor while others climb out.
Now there is an academic study that maps this even more closely.
Two economist, Professor Aasha Kapur and Professor Shashanka Bhide, have analysed data collected by the National Council of Applied Economic Research over three decades.
First in the 70s, then in 80s and finally in late 90s, researchers went back to the same 3,000 odd families in 260 villages across the country to find out how they had fared.
What they found was deeply disturbing. Between 1971 and 1981, 52 per cent of the poor had remained poor.
While the number came down in the next two decades (1981-1998), at 38.6 per cent it was still alarmingly high. This confirms that in India, poverty is chronic, persistent and often unshakeable.
"There are people in parts of India who have lived in poverty themselves, whose parents are living in poverty and whose children are also going to inherit that poverty. Even though poverty has declined in aggregate at the national level, but the truth is there are people who have lived and are living in poverty. The issue is how do you track people's lives and understand poverty in that context," says Professor Aasha Kapur.
Drivers: What keeps people stuck in poverty?
- High healthcare costs
- Adverse market conditions
- Loss of assets
- High interest loans from moneylenders
- Social expenses, deaths, marriages
- Crop failure
Maintainers: What keeps people stuck in poverty?
- Casual agricultural labour
- Landless households
- Illiterate households
- Large households with more children
Interrupters: What helps escape from poverty?
- More income earning opportunities
- Proximity to urban areas
- Improved infrastructure
- Initial literacy status of household head
- Income from physical assets: cropland, livestock, house
Another important finding of the study is that while more people among the Scheduled Castes have been able to escape poverty, fewer among scheduled tribes have been able to do so.
No wonder, remote tribal areas show up as India's hunger spots.